spacer.png, 0 kB
Delivery Methods
Clients have several delivery methods available to them when they are planning a project. The four basic types include: Construction Management At Risk and Construction Management As Agent, Gross Maximum Price or Competitive Bidding and Design-Build.

Wright Brothers, The Building Company is a full service contractor that has the ability to contract in all of the delivery methods listed above for a variety of job types and sizes. There are many different ways to deliver design and construction services. One size does not fit all; therefore, we offer a number of alternatives which gives the client more flexibility to choose an appropriate and effective delivery method for their particular project. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages that will have an impact on the success of the building project. However, regardless of the delivery method, our approach to every project is the same—our commitment to excellence in quality, safety, state-of-the-art project management and estimating software are always implemented to surpass your expectations.

Please click on one of the methods below to see which one fits you best.


Comparison of Alternative Delivery Systems

Construction Manager At-Risk (CMAR)


This delivery method overlaps the design and construction phases by obtaining a construction manager early in the process as a collaborative team member offering significant construction input during the design phase of the project The construction manager is “at risk” for the guaranteed price. The final construction price is the sum of the CM’s fee, overhead, and contingencies and the subcontractor’s proposals.

CM-AR MAP

CM At-Risk Advantages:
The construction manager and design team work together to develop and estimate the design. This in turn allows for the design and construction activities to be overlapped to accelerate project deliver.

Owner selects the general contractor based on qualifications to perform professional construction management services

During the schematic design and design development, the construction manager will provide cost estimating, construction reviews, scheduling and value engineering.

CM At-Risk Disadvantages:

Because the construction documents are incomplete at the time the GMP is established, there is sometimes ambiguity concerning the scope of work included under the GMP. The owner may be financially liable for exclusions and inconsistencies in the contract documents.

Difficult to evaluate GMP during the early stages.
Best Suited For:

Large new or renovation projects that are schedule sensitive, difficult to define or subject to potential changes; also for projects requiring a high level of construction management due to multiple phases, technical complexity or multi-disciplinary coordination.

Our professional experience for CMAR includes:

Sheridan College Student Housing

 

 

Construction Management As Agent (CM)



In this delivery method the owner will select a construction management (CM) firm to provide owner’s representation and oversee the management of subcontractors. The CM firm does not actually hold the subcontracts but is authorized to manage the subcontracts for the owner. This delivery method is of lower risk for the CM firm as they are not financially responsible for either the design or construction of the project. CM as Agent (also known as Owner’s Rep) is usually contracted by the owner for a fixed professional fee. Related terminology is construction manager or owner’s representative.

CM MAP

As a certified licensed Construction Manager, we are able to offer quality Construction Management Advisor or Construction Management Constructor Services. With our understanding of the design process and by participating in the early phases of a project, our input on materials, systems, construction methods, project schedules project costs and construction document analysis can greatly enhance the end result.

CM - Agent Advantages:

The construction manager and design team work together to develop and estimate the design. This in turn allows for the design and construction activities to be overlapped to accelerate project deliver.
Owner selects the general contractor based on qualifications to perform professional construction management services

During the schematic design and design development, the construction manager will provide cost estimating, construction reviews, scheduling and value engineering.

Construction Manager has fiduciary responsibility to owner.

CM - Agent Disadvantages:

The owner may be financially liable for exclusions and inconsistencies in the contract documents.

Difficult to evaluate GMP during the early stages.

Owner bears all risk and reward


Best Suited For:

 

Construction sophisticated clients, fast track projects, clients with an accounting system for purchasing in place.

Some of our experience in this project delivery method includes:

Idaho Velodrome & Cycling Park
First Security Service Center
Eagle City Library
CESCO


Back to Delivery Methods

 

 

 

 

 


 

                Gross Maximum Profit (GMP)

The traditional project delivery system is where the owner contracts with an architect to provide “complete” design documents and solicits the low bid from general contractors to perform the work. Following award of the project, the general contractor enters into a contract with the owner to construct the project in accordance with the plans and specifications. The general contractor will subcontract all or part of its work to subcontractors.

GROSS MAXIMUM PRICE

 

 

GMP/Design Bid Build Advantages:
Construction documents must clearly define the contractual scope of work.

Traditional and familiar delivery method.
Simple process.
GMP/Design Bid Build Disadvantages:

General contractors have little opportunity to offer the owner alternative design options that would improve or add value to the project.

Cost of work is unknown until the bids are received. If contractor bids come in over budget, additional time and money are spent on redesign.
Linear process means longer schedule duration. Design first then develop cost, then build.
Best Suited For:
Less complicated projects that are budget sensitive, but are not schedule sensitive and not subject to change. Owner can completely control the design.
Our experience in this delivery method is extensive. The following are examples:
Sho Pai Trade & Travel Center
Winding Creek
Boise State Stadium Expansion
Nazareth Catholic Retreat Center
Boise WaterShed Education Facility
DESIGN-BUILD (DB)
In Design-Build, the owner contracts a contractor and architect as a single entity to provide both design and construction for their project under a single contract. This single source approach creates a Design-Build Team who are “at-risk” for the cost, schedule, quality and management of the project.

A guaranteed maximum price (GMP) is provided by the Design-Builder early in the project, based upon design criteria prepared by the owner and a moderately developed design by the architect. The design-builder then develops drawings that fulfill the criteria and complete the design, while staying below the furnished GMP. The contractor then receives proposals from and awards subcontracts to subcontractors.

DB Map

Design-Build Advantages:

• Single point of responsibility
• Early knowledge of firm costs
• All parties treated as professionals
• Reduced administration for owners
• Cost effectiveness
• Time savings
• Risks are allocated to the party best able to manage the risk
Design-Build Disadvantages:
• Owners must have sufficient knowledge about design and construction issues to effectively establish project program
requirements and performance expectations.
• Clearly Communicating the project scope of work prior to design is sometimes difficult

Best Suited For:
New construction projects that are highly time sensitive, projects with smaller user groups or reduced need for user reviews and mid-course design changes.
Wright Brothers’ strong relationships with many architects allow us to draw upon qualified and experienced design professionals in all types of construction for design-build projects. This relationship coupled with our strong subcontractor base, provides a dynamic resource to benefit the needs of the client.
Our Experience includes:
12th Avenue Stores
Boise Hawks Memorial Stadium
The Cottages
Kittyhawk Plaza
Eagle Mini Storage
Marianne Zakarian OBGYN

 
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB